Bauhaus “Form follows
function” and “Less is more.”
The Bauhaus was an art school in Germany that combined crafts and
the fine arts and was famous for the approach to design that it publicised and
taught. It operated from 1919 to 1933.
The Bauhaus was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar with the idea of
creating a "total" work of art in which all arts, including
architecture, would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus had a profound
influence upon subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design,
interior design, industrial design, and typography.
The school existed in three German cities: Weimar from 1919
to 1925, Dessau from 1925 to 1932 and Berlin from 1932 to 1933, under three
different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928, Hannes Meyer from
1928 to 1930 and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe from 1930 until 1933, when the school
was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime. The Nazi
government claimed that it was a centre of communist intellectualism. The
changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus,
technique, instructors, and politics. Though the school was closed, the staff
continued to spread its idealistic precepts as they left Germany and emigrated all over the
world.
Walter Gropius wanted to create a new architectural style to
reflect this new era. His style in architecture and consumer goods was to be
functional, cheap and consistent with mass production. To these ends, Gropius
wanted to reunite art and craft to arrive at high-end functional products with
artistic merit. Gropius believed that in order to export innovative and high
quality goods, a new types of designers were needed and so was a new type of
art education. The school's philosophy stated that the artist should be trained
to work with the industry. Gropius explained his vision for a union of art and
design in the Proclamation of the Bauhaus (1919), which described a utopian
craft guild combining architecture, sculpture, and painting into a single creative
expression. Gropius developed a craft-based curriculum that would turn out
artisans and designers capable of creating useful and beautiful objects
appropriate to this new system of living.
The Bauhaus combined elements of both fine arts and design education.
The curriculum commenced with a preliminary course that immersed the students,
who came from a diverse range of social and educational backgrounds, in the
study of materials, colour theory, and formal relationships in preparation for
more specialized studies. This preliminary course was often taught by visual
artists, including Paul Klee, Vasily Kandinsky, and Josef Albers, among others.
Following their immersion in Bauhaus theory, students
entered specialised workshops, which included metalworking, cabinetmaking,
weaving, pottery, typography, and wall painting. Although Gropius' initial aim
was a unification of the arts through craft, aspects of this approach proved
financially impractical. While maintaining the emphasis on craft, he
repositioned the goals of the Bauhaus in 1923, stressing the importance of
designing for mass production. It was at this time that the school adopted the
slogan "Art into Industry."
Along with Gropius, and many other artists and teachers,
both Laszlo Moholy-Nagy and Herbert Bayer made significant contributions to the
development of graphic design. Among its many contributions to the development
of design, the Bauhaus taught typography as part of its curriculum and was
instrumental in the development of sans-serif typography, which they favoured
for its simplified geometric forms and as an alternative to the heavily ornate
German standard of blackletter typography.
Teachers and students at the Bauhaus talked and argued about
many topics: The place of art in an increasingly technological society; Were
the arts a matter of individual expression? Would a new, more egalitarian
society require a new, and perhaps more impersonal art? Could new forms of
expression be reconciled with capitalist methods of production?
To these questions they offered many answers, most often in
the form of actual objects and works of art, nearly all of them beautiful, some
masterworks, which now fill the galleries on the sixth floor of the Museum of
Modern Art, some impractical and today seen as unrealistic. The truth was that
there could never be any definitive answer. Today we question how the revolutionary
dreams of the Bauhaus became our everyday realities, and in some cases our
everyday banalities. Critics today look at the work of the Bauhaus and try and figure
out what went wrong. They ask how the glorious promise of the Bauhaus became so
terribly tarnished, and in so many respects misunderstood.
With a more rational and balanced view, critics today now
believe the Bauhaus means something very different. There is questioning and
doubt. Not everything was practical and perfect. The way the Bauhaus
represented the unifying power of geometry is something no longer generally
shared. Some believe that the school may indeed still be relevant, but only the
Expressionist early period, which is very different to what is normally
associated with the term "Bauhaus."
With a more rational and balanced view, critics today now
believe the Bauhaus means something very different. There is questioning and
doubt. Not everything was practical and perfect. The way the Bauhaus
represented the unifying power of geometry is something no longer generally
shared. Some believe that the school may indeed still be relevant, but only the
Expressionist early period, which is very different to what is normally
associated with the term "Bauhaus."
The Bauhaus idea always represented a compromise between
conflicting tendencies; a fanciful, utopian spirit was balanced against a more
practical-minded, forward-looking character.
In regards to women and the Bauhaus, there were constraints
imposed on the school’s supposedly liberated female faculty and students. The
Bauhaus at first was intended to be gender-blind. However, Gropius became
alarmed by what he saw as the disproportionate number of women in a student
body that never numbered more than 150 matriculates at any given moment, which
prompted him to steer women away from the supposedly “masculine” architecture
curriculum and toward the traditionally “feminine” crafts workshops.
One of the most interesting parts of the Bauhaus was Kandinsky
and the Yellow-Triangle, Blue-Circle, and Red-Square. It was Kandinsky's idea that
there are certain fundamental associations between colours and shapes he proposed Yellow-Triangle, Blue-Circle, and
Red-Square. These associations were formulated introspectively, however, he did
conduct his own survey at the Bauhaus in 1923 by distributing questionnaires to
his professorial colleagues and students, and found that many of his colleagues
agreed with his associations; notable exceptions were his contemporaries, Klee
and Schlemmer, who favoured different form-colour combinations. In fact,
Kandinsky had already embarked upon a similar attempt to identify colour form
associations while still in Russia
with the aim to provide the scientific underpinning for his own intuitions.
Kandinsky's Yellow-Triangle, Blue-Circle, and Red-Square
equation inspired several projects at the Bauhaus in the early 1920s. The most
interesting is an amazing baby cradle by Peter Keler. This unusual, and rather
dangerous looking design, illustrates the association between shapes and
colours, and shows that Kandinky's ideas have mainly only historical
significance and that forms and colours do not have universal meaning or
correspondence.
THE principles of the Bauhaus are in many ways no longer a
valid model for modern design. The emphasis on hard, uncompromising surfaces characteristic
of the Bauhaus can be alienating and remote. Something more comfortable is
needed for everyday use. The Bauhaus was responsible for many designs for
ordinary objects that look modern and that appear to do a particular task with
a minimum of fuss. This simplicity can be deceptive. Often, in order to attain
the purified line, essential elements have been left out.
The avant-garde pushes the
boundaries of what is accepted as the norm. The Bauhaus confronted tradition
and developed new ways of doing things, but struggled to legitimise their new
ideas. The rhetoric created by change can be more powerful than the
changes themselves. If the rhetoric is really good, with lots of catch-phrases
and easy concepts such as 'form follows function', and 'less is more', it can
take on a life of its own. The Bauhaus had, if nothing else, terrific rhetoric.